 | | Re: Official Parts using MLCad colors
|
|
(...) How about color 462 in 777p01.dat? (15 years ago, 30-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Official Parts using MLCad colors
|
|
Hi, Scott Wardlaw has written a prog which matches the colors used in the official parts against the now updated LDConfig.ldr colors chart. This is a list of parts that use colors which were mainly defined in MLCad and have never been LDraw colors: (...) (15 years ago, 30-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Quirks with Peeron part inventory images
|
|
(...) Well at least 60483 and 62462 have corrupted images: (URL) (15 years ago, 30-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Quirks with Peeron part inventory images
|
|
(...) Thanks. The four parts that I was made aware of have been fixed manually, but until I understand the problem, there may be others. Chris (15 years ago, 30-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with LDCfgalt.ldr and between LDConfig.ldr and LDDP
|
|
(...) I'm trying to trace this issue but it's taking longer that I expected. I should have a fix by tomorrow. -Orion (15 years ago, 30-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with LDCfgalt.ldr and between LDConfig.ldr and LDDP
|
|
(...) I was wondering what this file was for. I wish I had known, as I really prefer colored edges. I have been providing a colored edge LDconfig file with my software that converts it for MLCAD use: (URL) you want to give my file a try, would it (...) (15 years ago, 30-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with LDCfgalt.ldr and between LDConfig.ldr and LDDP
|
|
(...) People? You mean person. I think the only real reason for creating that file in the first place was to hush my whining about boring colors. (URL) got a nice laugh from the delicious irony of stealthily replacing the shiny candy colors with the (...) (15 years ago, 30-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Quirks with Peeron part inventory images
|
|
(...) FYI, this problem now appears to be resolved - I now see the correct part images in the inventory mentioned above. Thanks, Jim (15 years ago, 30-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) In the mklist beta I posted there's an undocumented -r switch to turn off the ragged edges and make room for 25 char filenames. There's also an undocumented -t to twiddle with the 78 vs 80 character line formats. But there's nothing yet for (...) (15 years ago, 29-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
Sorry to follow-up my own post, but I did a quick test on MLCAD. (...) I had a DUH! moment after posting the previous message. If MLCAD can use a ragged format file, of course it can use a fixed-25 format file. DOH. (...) I prepared a PARTS.LST file (...) (15 years ago, 29-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | mklist 1.6beta1
|
|
(...) I'm assuming the 80 char lines is what you're aiming for here, so based on the 64 char limit on descriptions I started the descriptions on the 16th character of the line. That gives room for a 15 character name and a single space before the (...) (15 years ago, 29-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with LDCfgalt.ldr and between LDConfig.ldr and LDDP
|
|
(...) I seem to remember that part of the reason to have LDCfgalt.ldr was for people who prefer the colored edge lines. Actually, it seems like that was a big part of the reason to have the file. So why drop that functionality? Steve (15 years ago, 29-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) My thinking is the 'ragged' format has the least impact - if there are no long part nambers, then the output PARTS.LST would exactly match the classic format, without the user having to know anything about long/short part nambers. Of course, (...) (15 years ago, 29-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with LDCfgalt.ldr and between LDConfig.ldr and LDDP
|
|
(...) LDCfgalt.ldr has been kept for backwards compatibility but colors have been substituted with grey to encourage the shift to the new LDConfig.ldr file and colors. w. (15 years ago, 29-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Problems with LDCfgalt.ldr and between LDConfig.ldr and LDDP
|
|
I noticed two issues with the new versions of LDConfig.ldr: - LDCfgalt.ldr contains only grey colors (#c1c1c1) with black edge. Though I never used LDCfgalt this seems weird to me. - When I install the new LDConfig.ldr, LDDP replacement feature is (...) (15 years ago, 29-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Quirks with Peeron part inventory images
|
|
(...) Hmmm. All the images are re-generated as part of a Parts Update, so that's probably the source of this problem. But nothing has changed in that process since 2009-01. However, at around that time there were problems with the server where these (...) (15 years ago, 29-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Quirks with Peeron part inventory images
|
|
Hi all, I was perusing a Peeron inventory and noticed the wrong images were displayed for a few parts. Parts 3062b, 6233, and 6019 are displayed as other parts in the following inventory: (URL) is a screenshot just in case it is a temporary problem: (...) (15 years ago, 29-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 11-16 primitives?
|
|
(...) Yeah, I was actually planning a -f to force it to finish and -q for quiet. (...) For now I've added a -8 to make it use the 8.3 format. As per Travis' suggestion it converts to the canonical short form under Windows. The function uppercases (...) (15 years ago, 28-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: LD4DStudio 1.1 Beta 3 Released
|
|
(...) Hello Mike, I've looked at those specs when I worked on the program but it seemed, to me, in a very early stage of development. So I build the 'suggestion database' instead for the time being. Also the proposed information far surpasses the (...) (15 years ago, 28-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LD4DStudio 1.1 Beta 3 Released
|
|
I was wondering if your program uses same format as or could output to the LDraw Connection Database? (URL) would be cool to have a single database for connections, and even allow users to "submit" newly discovered connections just by using your (...) (15 years ago, 27-Sep-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
