 | | Re: LDDP 2.0 questions
|
|
My opinions... (I won't strongly defend them!) (...) Use this as default but allow user to change. (...) I generally use no header at start and when my part is finished I run Datheader on it to fix everything. So the way it works now if fine with (...) (18 years ago, 2-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDDP 2.0 questions
|
|
(...) As a programmer that has used LDDP only a few times, here are my opinions, for what they are worth: (...) I would prefer to see this fully configurable. Let the user choose where in the search path LDRAW is included. But the default should be (...) (18 years ago, 2-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDDP 2.0 questions
|
|
As I implement feature requests and other things, this thread will track the questions I have to the users of LDDP. Here's the first round: - Search paths I've added the ability to add custom search paths but currently the LDraw Base paths and the (...) (18 years ago, 2-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Best practice for using unofficial parts?
|
|
(...) I think the cheese slope is the perfect example of this happening. Most of my early MPDs using it are misoriented by 90 degrees due to a change in the part. (...) See above ;) Tim (18 years ago, 1-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Best practice for using unofficial parts?
|
|
(...) Do you have any help files on that tool? I don't understand how to use it. For one thing I put unofficial parts into my regular LDRAW\PARTS directory, so there is no "unofficial parts path." I wasn't aware that MLCAD could scan multiple parts (...) (18 years ago, 1-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
