 | | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
(...) Such a rule about the using images generated from Ldraw would be impossible to enforce even if it did exist. That would be like Microsoft claiming ownership of every document made with MS Office or a paint company saying that they own the end (...) (16 years ago, 19-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
(...) True, and given the amount of LEGO related books that have been published in the last few years we have a set a precedence supporting this idea. -Orion (16 years ago, 19-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
(...) Thanks for your answers, Tore. Only instructions would be sold, so software would not be a concern. Jim (16 years ago, 19-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
(...) Since the discussion you linked contained much debate about the derivative status of rendered images, I'd like to know if anyone wearing a SteerCo hat can confirm my conclusion. "Commercial sale of instruction images rendered from LDraw models (...) (16 years ago, 19-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions About Selling Custom Model Instructions: Confirming LEGO/LDraw Consent
|
|
(...) Yes. The purpose of my post was to have them answered again, up-to-date and in direct response to the ideas I set forth. (...) The readme suggests that rendered images are not considered derivative works. Since an instruction booklet consists (...) (16 years ago, 19-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
