 | | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
|
(...) I'm guessing it's related, but there's presumably something you did that QT Designer doesn't do, or vice versa. Obviously QT is designed so that apps can be written completely without using QT Designer. One thing you might do is create a (...) (19 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
|
(...) Hmmm..... one major difference is that I didn't use the designer for any of my GUI. I wonder if that is why things are different. Kevin (19 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Is anyone working on 32745?
|
|
(...) Do you fancy a divide and conquer approach? If we each did different sections it might make it more possible. At the least it is a fairly easy part to subdivide. Tim (19 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
|
(...) I figured that Development would be use by parts authors. I was offering it as an alternative to D:work_in_progress. LSynth it is. Kev (19 years ago, 28-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
|
(...) Perfect - many thx! Don't think there is any need for "development" but "<LDRAWDIR>LSynth" wouldn't hurt. You could then store all constraints and synthesis parts in that folder without the need to mix them with the official parts or rebuild (...) (19 years ago, 27-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
