 | | Re: LDLite and LDS (Was: Call for GUI part editor)
|
|
(...) That's cool. Probably a more versatile notation would be: P2 -10 -10 -10 P3 0 P2.y 0 P4 10 P2.y 10 Can you also do chained values? eg: P2 -10 -10 -10 P3 0 y2 0 P4 10 y3 10 ROSCO (18 years ago, 18-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDLite and LDS (Was: Call for GUI part editor)
|
|
(...) I had no idea of that. How long has this been an LDLite feature? It reminds at least me of LDS code. The same thing in LDS would look like this: P1 10 0 10 P2 -10 -10 -10 P3 0 -10 0 P4 10 -10 10 3 1 P1 P2 P3 3 2 P2 P3 P4 Is it possible to let, (...) (18 years ago, 18-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for GUI part editor
|
|
(...) Yeah. :) (...) BTW, there are at least 2 reason not to use MLCAD to create parts which you want to contribute to LDraw.org: 1. (General reason) it's more work than doing it in an enhanced text editor. 2. (Specifically) MLCAD does things to the (...) (18 years ago, 18-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for GUI part editor
|
|
(...) OoooOOOooo. Cool. I don't have time to play with it right this week, but I definitely will grab it when I do get time. Steve (18 years ago, 18-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: Variants of 646*.dat
|
|
(...) Chris, Thanks for continuing work on this 'project'. Actually, I appreciate everyone involved in this effort. You mentioned discussion of a naming scheme. I don't see (in this thread) where that was discussed. If you could point me in the (...) (18 years ago, 18-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
