 | | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
|
(...) IMHO there is no reason why someone can't invent something new. Especially as anything new would be still compatible with LDraw standards (otherwise the author would have to reinvent the wheel, the LDraw library and the existing Lego-Cad tools (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
|
Ok. So this is exactly the reason I didn't want anyone to invent a new animation scripting language for Legos! It is something new and is in danger of: being a sucky 1.0 release (or worse, never reaching 1.0), and not getting widespread use and so (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
(...) Damien, Please change the name of your program. Peeron is a trademark of Dan and Jennifer Boger. Your program is not associated with the Peeron site. The name you chose above has obvious similarities to the Peeron trademark, and may cause (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
Hi lego fans, I have finished the package and documentation for Peeroml, a scripting tool and programming framework for lego inventories. Its scripting language is OCaml (URL) Of course questions about Peeroml are off-topic on existing OCaml mailing (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Lsynth and control points
|
|
(...) You mean the hose end parts? They should be fine, but if you're talking about something else, I'm afraid I'm too ignorant to know what it is ;-) -NB (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
