|
|
 | | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
| (...) Actually, I'd very much like to figure what definition information can be put in part files, and how model files could then specify the specific way the part is deformed. Steve (21 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Snatch it?
|
| (...) use his parts then you'll have to rework them for PT complience and then (...) giving credit to the original author. (...) here we go: gonta Scrive: (...) (URL) and proxy to the PT. anybody volunteering to fix them? w. (21 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New LDraw contest?
|
| (...) There is another ongoing contest related to LDraw animation. Who will be the first to set up a system for LDraw animating made really easy? I know at least four different attempts, including my LDA2001. Maybe LD4D is the most promising so far. (...) (21 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.animation)
| | | | | Re: New LDraw contest?
|
| (...) Quarterly sounds good to me too. Since this has the potential to be really cool, and its not as often as once a month, I wonder what the chance of getting people/companies to sponsor small prizes (less than USD 50 value) for the winners? Does (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: New LDraw contest?
|
| (...) Quarterly sounds pretty realistic. Bi-monthly would be better, but maybe too optimistic. Depends on how many people out there think that they can contribute ... speak up, folks! >Is there any interest in this? Lots!! I'm working on the Ldraw (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
