 | | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
Bill As has been pointed out, many of the programs (including mine) have freely available source code. Several people have suggested I post my application on SourceForge and develop from there, this has merits and is used by Don with LdGLite, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: CMDLINE (Issues on Parts Tracker)
|
|
(...) I have always liked CMDLINE followed by a default colour, and I have the feeling that I am one of those who have used it most times. I also think it really is a pity that it hasn't been used by any [online] catalog or other partlisters (that I (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I understand the feeling. For me, when I open up my work (I don't code, but I do write, papers, a book, proposals, etc) to others, I expect and welcome criticism, so long as it is framed constructively. If I were to venture a guess, you aren't (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) That is closest. (...) I am not familiar to the exact meaning of open source, but I guess it can be a little like when you submit the dat code for a part to the PT. Suddenly you find that it has been changed or even renamed. In almost all (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I was speaking abstractly. (...) Yes, I agree. And it was good that you brought the topic up - I'm glad it will get developers thinking about open source. -Tim (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
