 | | Re: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - Summary please!
|
|
I tend to agree on both points. I would like to point out that primitives is mis-spelled in the example. Let's make sure that the official way has the correct spelling ;-). --Travis Cobbs (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiple MovedTo Arguments Really Legal?
|
|
"Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:Hu5oLv.Eu4@lugnet.com... (...) me (...) But this is just a workarround to avoid any message. It won't solve the problem. I could imagine, doing a repetative check for (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: V3.00 Bug? / Beauty Error?
|
|
Hi Ludo, "ludo soete" <ludo.soete@village.uunet.be> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:Hu66H9.ouy@lugnet.com... (...) club (...) the (...) error (...) thanks for this report I'll go and have a look. Michael (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - Summary please!
|
|
"Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HuG3s7.qDu@lugnet.com... <SNIP> (...) it out (...) appear in (...) data (...) numbers (...) responded. (...) the (...) the (...) Easier ? Hmmm - when you read from a file its (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - Summary please!
|
|
"Kim Toll" <kim.toll@intel.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HuHvvE.w2t@lugnet.com... <SNIP> (...) base (...) indicates (...) let them (...) with (...) view. (...) the (...) official (...) models and (...) This is a good idea, theoretically we can (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
