 | | Re: Vintage lightbrick 2 x 4
|
|
(...) It's easy. If the part comes (came) in only one color, you may add: 0 CMDLINE -c47 for clear. It's from the original LDraw. If you run this line: ldraw.exe 3001.dat -c47 , you get a clear 2x4 brick. And so on... /Tore (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote: [much snippage] (...) The above example parallel directory structure is just an example. I see that there are many possible alternate solutions... POV directory as sigbling of LDRAW subdirectory, where the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) One thing the project clearly needs right now is a small homepage to tell what it's all about, and outline what people can do to help. That might help pull in more active participants than a lone CVS archive. I've seen your pages, Larry. I bet (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <much snippage> (...) As Orion described, we'd rather put the ability of using POV or whatever other renderer you choose outside the LDraw file format, and outside the LDraw format parts library. If we (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW TO LUGNET
|
|
(...) time. Thanks for those nice animations of some of my moc's too! All I say to you is keep going with your animations because it's so refreshing compared to 'just' pictures. Nathanael (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: NATHANAELS 4099 TRANSFORMER
|
|
(...) Thanks both Steve for his great animation and you too Jaco! So you haven't seen this moc before Jaco? It was also there at LEGOworld. Maybe you'll see it nexttime. Den Helder perhaps? Nathanael (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Vintage lightbrick 2 x 4
|
|
I never thought this vintage part would be reviewed so quickly :-) Two more comments: (...) Whoops, my fault (shamed I did not notice that....) (...) I don't know about this statement, can somebody explain this for me? As I noticed on the pictures (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) The relatively easy solution on how to make the wrench tool and, even more obvious, the (unofficial) patterned maxifig heads - that solution has become undone. (...) The only thing that ever has frustrated me about LGEO is that I never ever (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A&M LWorks Presents a Jamie Neufeld Creation: Slave-1 POD
|
|
Here is a preview of what the next Star Wars POD will be: after moderation: (URL) direct link (URL) (hint: TIE Fighter) (hint 2: TIE Avenger (not in image) also will be released soon) -AHui A&M LWorks (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.inst, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy on embedding POV-Ray code in Official Files
|
|
(...) What's entailed? Do you want participants who can test but not do much else? (21 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
