|
|
 | | Tile 2 x 2 with red/white top pattern
|
| While I was browsing the PT, I noticed some comments in the votes for two of my parts: (7 URLs) First, which set did these parts come in? These came in the scala jewelry sets: (URL) 3068bpf1 came in set 308, 309, 310, 311, 312 3068bpf2 came in set (...) (21 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: -.5 or -0.5?
|
| (...) The compactor tool in LDAO removes such leading zeroes, so any parts authored or cleaned-up with this are likely to exhibit this feature. Chris (21 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: work in progress - 33009.dat, minifig book
|
| (...) Regardless of whether or not any patterned versions of a part exist, a base part without any pattern should be submitted to the library. If there are more than a few [1] patterned parts then a subfile structure should be created to reduce the (...) (21 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | | Re: -.5 or -0.5?
|
| (...) Well, there are a little bit over 100 parts in my library with this format, from 4006.dat made 1998-10 to 10 parts and 1 primitive in the latest update. (Give or take a few) /Tore (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: -.5 or -0.5?
|
| (...) The best I can tell is this has been in practice since December 1997. There are at least 125 official part files that have this in them. There are 17 official primitives also. So, this can't be too much of a problem or we would have heard (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
