|
|
 | | Re: Callout generation
|
| "Kevin L. Clague" <kevin_clague@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HDC5Gu.1ux3@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) is (...) get (...) level. (...) seperated (...) I think so, I'd like to play with it. Mike -- Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | LDraw.org ETA
|
| Hi Kevin et. al., Hopefully you're not being deluged with this question - but do you have an estimated time till the LDraw site is back up? Any thoughts as to whether it'll be hours versus *sob* days? Thanks, Shaun (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Callout generation
|
| (...) For now, I decided to make callout generation a seperate pass of the model. By disabling construction image generation, you can make changes to the callout specifications in your DAT files, Generate -> Instruction Images, and you won't run (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | FYI MPD not good with LPub
|
| I wanted folks to know that MPD and LPub work, but are not an optimal combination. LPub performs a date stamp comparison of the dat file it is processing at a given sub-model-level, and the images rendered for that dat file. If the files don't (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Callout generation
|
| (...) I recall some one (Dutch too) who started a Postscript project. It was about converting the LDraw format directly to PS. I asked this way back: (URL) (december 10 1999 :-) I got no reply... But then, Guido Heunen replied to another thread: (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
