 | | Re: Delphi user need help on VB6
|
|
(...) Use a timer control to manage the loading. Set the timer's Interval property to 1000, for one second. Make a module-level variable in the form to keep track of which image you've loaded. In the timer's event subroutine, load the next image (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of springs parts
|
|
(...) The spring is actually a part (assuming LEGO assembles their own pneumatic elements). So it should have its own number. I've emailed you the details a few minutes ago. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) I think the way it exists now is best. How noticeable is it that the sphere has no holes in it. Even if the part is transparent, the fact the the holes do not pass through the sphere is barely noticeable. Plus since this part is small in size, (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | [Parts Tracker] email address needed: Ildefonso Zanette
|
|
Ildefonso Zanette, Email being sent from the Parts Tracker to your address-of-record is bouncing. Can you send an updated address to parts@ldraw.org? Thanks! Steve Bliss (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) I think having the interior open would be a good thing for this part. However, we're rapidly approaching 1000 files backlogged on the Tracker. So I'm getting more willing to let stuff through that can be improved later. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | m889.ldr [DAT]
|
|
Since my first one went up intact... 0 889 Radar Truck 0 WRITE Name: m889.ldr 0 WRITE Author: John Riley <Rohnjiley@yahoo.com> 0 WRITE LDraw.org Official Model Repository 0 Official Model: ©1979 LEGO Group 0 ROTATION CENTER 71.2128 -54 -10 1 (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | m886.ldr PLUS I finally delurk [DAT]
|
|
Hello all, Now seems to be a good time to delurk. I am a graduate student, and thus don't have the time or money to really get into building. My current LEGO time is spent by digitizing the instructions from my golden lego years before they're lost (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) There was this unofficial generic rule that details smaller than 1 LDU may be omitted. I don't know if it is still valid. Another good rule, always valid, is common sense... :o) /Tore (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
I have a problem with the part Technic Pneumatic T Piece (URL) have two options - modelling a very accurate part, with inner details, but for this would produce a part with less standard primitives cylinder or sphere. - using as many as possible (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Level B Simplification - LDraw Boxer
|
|
(...) If I make the simplified versions of grooved tiles more detailed by making them out of two boxes instead of one (which I intend to), there will be very visible gaps. /Tore (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
