|
|
 | | Re: MPD spec
|
| (...) One addition that might be useful for people using the spec is to explicitly state that other than the first file being the main one, there is no implicit order to the remaining files. This is implied by the existing spec, but not actually (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: MPD spec
|
| Great! One question: I think I've seen some MPD files with the extension .dat and named exactly the same as its main model sub-file. IMHO, it's a risky thing to do. It's very easy to overwrite the main file with if the mpd is named the same. (It (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Monkeypede
|
| (...) And you can tell it was done on my computer too - check out the author credit on all the submodels :-D -Tim (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: Monkeypede
|
| (...) Cool, thanks a million! -Shiri (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: Monkeypede [DAT]
|
| (...) The problem is with LUGNET's code to return LDraw content (the [DAT] hyperlink). It doesn't recognize the .ldr file extension. If you copy the code out of your message, and save it in a new file, the monkypede renders just fine. I've attached (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
