 | | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
(...) 8?) (...) Good idea! But thinking about it, the "aussie" word that works best is probably "cable", so maybe I'll use that. (...) Can do! Only reason its different is because Miguel's connector(s) are oriented that way & I was too lazy to (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Is Datsville still active?
|
|
I was looking at some of the posts on lugnet and i found the datsville website. This looks like quite an interesting project. But it seems as if it has not been updated anytime recently. Is dtasville still being actively updated by anyone, and are (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed)
|
|
(...) Hmmm. I tried that with a few quads (I'll fix them all soon) but it made no difference - they're still all blue. ROSCO (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Are these 2 tiles the same pattern?
|
|
Are these two tiles the same pattern? (URL) think they are, but the px2 part shows a handle on the side and 85 in the yellow box that aren't represented in the LDraw rendering p52. All of the tiles I have on hand are px2. If there is a variant like (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
Very interesting parts! I have a couple of comments, though. Perhaps the name "Technic Flex-System Wire" would be more appropriate? We already have "Technic Flex-System Hose" elements (76.DAT and 77.DAT), so I think that adding "Wire" makes sense. I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
