|
|
 | | Re: DuploCAD! PrimoCAD!
|
| (...) Um, yeah... I think I lost the... uh... (...) You, sir, should stop now. (...) The real ones say DUPLO, though older ones say LEGO. The LDraw ones say "LDRAW", and I believe that's for copyright reasons. -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (23 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.duplo, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: DuploCAD! PrimoCAD!
|
| (...) an Ldraw Lady Blacktron? For shame, Hafhead...! Looks great to me, although it is also true that I have zero real world Duplo to compare to. I especially like the trans colors. The trans colors are so candy-like it makes me want to reach right (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.duplo, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: Why Type 5 Lines?
|
| (...) Sorry, I never intended to imply that it should replace type 5 lines. In addition to the problem of backwards compatibility, this will only work for BFC-certified parts. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Alternate Type 5 line algorithm and other BFC questions...
|
| (...) Just check to see if the determinant of the matrix is negative. If it is, the matrix involves mirroring. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | DuploCAD! PrimoCAD!
|
| Here's a small scene, a sample of things to come: (URL) The last image is done with trans-colors. No, those parts don't exist in those colors. I was just trying to show the internals of the parts better. Next priority: Eggs! -- Tony Hafner (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.duplo, lugnet.cad) !!
|
|
