 | | Re: Will LMPL be Simulation-approach or Usage-approach ?
|
|
DG> Do not forget to download Spiderbot.dat (in lugnet.cad.models) It came automatically via e-mail. :) DG> We embody two different well-known approaches. Both of LCD and LMPL embody these two approaches. DG> First : the Simulation approach. DG> And (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re[4]: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
Hi Damien! DG> Now you speak about layers. DG> That is precisely what I called "multiple syntax levels". DG> Software layers are known to be very bad for software engineering and design DG> in general. I don't think so. What about object oriented (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: elimination of theme categories - is it time?
|
|
(...) Uhh, Franklin, we've had *four* releases with the Parts Tracker. :) (...) I've been working on this on and off. The Town parts are mostly already moved. We've just got to resolve issues with the walkie-talkie part. Castle will be easy to (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
Looks promising! I'm pretty excited that there's another program that does inlining. :) I only played with it for a minute or two. I had a couple of problems: - The Inline option was always disabled. I only found Inline on the context menu. Is there (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New tool: LDDesignPad 0.3 for LDraw
|
|
Hello! Thank you very much for all your praise and suggestions regarding LDDP! Expect a new version tomorrow ;). Play well! Carsten (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
