|
|
 | | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
| (...) Not what I meant. James had the number wrong. That's not the number for that element. (...) I've never seen an element numbered 2881, James had that one wrong too. But that's my name for that element. It's served me well for the 8+ years I've (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Wallpapers
|
| Pretty neat, Tim : ) Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:Gpsozu.8u1@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
|
| (...) No, sorry - the bulk of this research was from (a lot of) miscellanous parts in my spares box, and I cannot be sure of the providence of many of my made up sets, so any info from them would be near worthless. (...) Unless problems with the use (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Wallpapers
|
| I just threw together this design for a LEGO wallpaper last night. I know its not the greatest thing in the world, but it was a quick one - inspired by the memory of the (apparently) long lost BrickDreams renderings. All I really did was put light (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Re: New style of part file 3941 vs. 6143
|
| (...) I guess it does! I've got some comments below, but for now, let's stick with the two documented part numbers. If someone wants to create these non-functional variations of the part(s), I'm ok with that. But let's not get into xxxxA, xxxxB, (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
