 | | Re: Good news (and l3p feature request)
|
|
(...) in my PATH. Oops! No wonder it seemed like such a good idea. I must have read all about it already in the release notes. Don (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) So, does anyone know what the Danish term is? Or the part names? (...) Nod, exactly. And, since we're working in English, with translations or totally different names, it's possibly worse. By 'worse', I mean that I expect that part names in (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) :p Sorry, this is a one-name system. Although, after browsing the parts reference at Rene Hoffmeister's site -- (URL) -- I've been wondering about a multi-language parts registry/database. (...) Nod, yes. (...) Yes, there is. It's 32523, and (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news (and l3p feature request)
|
|
(...) It has worked for me since June 2000: (URL) "Support for hi-res primitives Primitives in P\48 and future numeric subdirectories of P are also supported. L3P skips any digit-only directory before attempting primitive substitution, and thus (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) OK. I generally use 'rod' as a straight synonym for 'bar'. If some other people like 'Technic Rod', then let's go with that. (...) In that case, can we move the 'Brick with pin(s)' parts to Technic Brick? (...) Oooo, cool. :) So it *is* a (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
