 | | Re: Fixed my gallery come and see
|
|
The 256 looks pretty good to me. Cool anim BTW :-) G Eduardo Vazquez Harte <eduvazhar@terra.es> wrote in message news:GMt20o.70v@lugnet.com... (...) 56k (...) animations (23 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Some questions about MPEG 1 standards (long)
|
|
Thanks for the free computer lesson. I'll continue for with the standard that I made. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Some questions about MPEG 1 standards
|
|
(...) That's not true, it is indeed 1125 kbits / second. (...) And these figures should have been in Mbits / second. I seem to be in the "divide by 1000" mood today... Fredrik (23 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Some questions about MPEG 1 standards (long)
|
|
(...) is (...) dvd. (...) Eduardo, Unfortunately, it is not as easy as that. Bit rate is a poor measure of quality because it doesn't actually determine quality all by itself. I worked in a educational laboratory where we studied video over the web (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | RE: Fixed my gallery come and see
|
|
(...) one? 256 looks pretty good. Most of my full length DivX (MPEG-4) movies (2 hours) are approximately 500x300 pixels and 700 MB, which is definitely good enough quality to watch. That's about 100KB/sec, right? --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
