 | | Re: Unofficial Update Progress
|
|
(...) Watch out here, Franklin submitted the SW heads twice, once without the P and a three digit pattern number, then he resent them with the two letter pattern code. Maybe the non-P parts should be ignored? Dan (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Developers Wanted
|
|
I got a question in email, and I thought the answer would be of general interest. The question: (...) The answer: In short, very loose form, the main workflow is: Process 1: Author uploads file -> Reviewers check out file -> Reviewers check/certify (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Update Progress
|
|
Bravo! -Chuck (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Unofficial Update Progress
|
|
I am working on an 'unofficial update' page. Just to have a handle for it, I'm labeling it 'update 2001-01', although after update 2001-02, the unofficial update will go away, cease to exist, become as though it never was. Some things that I am (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
(...) Paul, I don't know if you saw earlier messages about the Part Tracker, but there was some discussion about whether or not we could use CVS as a backend to an automated system. What do you think? There are a number of features we need that (I (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Developers Wanted
|
|
(...) This "problem" seems to be quite familiar to a lot of us ;-) (...) (d) I looked at it, but it was practically only GUI stuff without the necessary functionality, and I'm not the right guy to comment on GUIs... (...) Yes, that would have been (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Developers Wanted
|
|
(...) Right now, it's a monolithic project; there hasn't been any segmentation of tasks. That's mostly my fault; I haven't reviewed the progress Dan has made, so I can't say where there's a need for work. It's also an artifact of not having a good (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Introducing Hammerhead, another COG-shifting walking biped
|
|
Hi all, Just wanted to let you know that I've updated the TechPup site to include Hammerhead, a mono-engine, COF-shifting walking biped. I've also included the dat file plus printed instructions. Unfortunately, Vision Command will NOT work on my (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw parts as 3D objects
|
|
Hi Matthew, I once played with converting parts to 3DMF files. I used Perl to translate them. It's far from perfect but read my message, some of the URLs are still live and lead to some graphics: (URL) this point it would be easy to export 3DMF from (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Pictures From Big April 28th Southern California Meeting
|
|
(...) It's going to be hard to get very much out of us, because I saw how well structured your code was and how easy it was to make changes. Crying "it's hard, you have to pay a lot" will fall flat. I know better. :-) ++Lar (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw parts as 3D objects
|
|
(...) Hi. I found this post, but not sure if you seen it... (URL) that helps. (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
(...) This sounds almost like communistic ideology: For the project to ultimately become open, it must first become more closed for a while! ;-) (...) That's undoubtedly an interesting idea. Fredrik (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw parts as 3D objects
|
|
Hey all, I've done a (not so extensive) search of the .cad groups and related web sites, and haven't seen this mentioned (though it may have been-sorry if that is so). Have the .dat parts from LDraw ever been collected into an archive of 3D objects? (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Pictures From Big April 28th Southern California Meeting
|
|
Quite possibly, around the July 4th timeframe. Although I am toying with the idea of extorting money from Larry for a private GOB version of LDLite... -gyug (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
HeeHeee! I have great faith in Tim that one day LDraw will become an open project, but I don't think it has ever been one in the past! :) As soon as the parts library is opened up, I promise I'll check it all into Sourceforge.org, so one can use (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Developers Wanted
|
|
(...) Email me with some things that need to be done and I let you know what I can do. Paul (I have been busy updating some of the parts I have receintly "finished" also currently reworking the aquazone propellor) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
Just use a script to do that or even a small program, I don't think you need to manually change each file. Leonardo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com>; (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
(...) That's a good idea, but it requires editing *all* of the files to be released. The idea of an unofficial release is that it's quick'n'dirty - as little work as possible. Processing a large number files, even if it is just a minor change, takes (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
how about making all unofficial parts go to "unofficial" group like bricks and plates? -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> wrote in message news:GCo1LK.Gpx@lugnet.com... (...) have (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
HMM a minor idea. group all Unofficial parts in "Unofficial" group like "brick" and "plate" type of group. -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
