 | | Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
(...) Perhaps we could break the job into smaller chunks, like maybe 20 parts a week to relieve the pipeline pressure. -Chuck (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
|
|
(...) Okay, this is getting ridiculous. We need a parts update. There are, what, hundreds?, of parts wasting in the pipeline. How much longer are they going to sit there? How can holding the parts for this long be justified? Give me unofficial (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker
|
|
No, I have not appointed any successor yet. I have only had three or four positive or semi-positive responses, so to me you look like a very strong candidate. In fact, the strongest. As you may know, the current TTracker is 100% manually updated (I (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Head with Darth Maul pattern - 3626bpDM.dat
|
|
"Franklin W. Cain" <fwcain@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GCKD9y.A93@lugnet.com... (...) Thanks! That means a lot coming from a master author such as yourself :) Dan (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Problems with reaching www.ldraw.org
|
|
Several people have in the last year reported problems with getting access to www.ldraw.org. The reason for this problem appears to be that the default "time-to-live" (TTL) for TCP packets is too low. I have now recieved confirmation that this is (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
