| | Re: Adding an image_map
|
|
Okay, I got it to work! I hadn't known that the picture was crammed into the 0,0/1,1 square. So the mass of gray pixels was in fact the picture, tiled beyond recognition. :) Thanks again, Coby! --Ryan (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
|
| | Re: Automatic Part Selection Query (Part 2)
|
|
(...) You can do that in a similar way already now: Select the parts by functionality (e.g. turning mechanism parts) and group them. Once you've grouped all parts, you can easely hide/unhide the groups as you like... Until now it's not possible to (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
|
| | Re: May I get train track dat file?
|
|
Zhengrong Zang wrote: What sort of track? 9V? 12V? duplo? (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Automatic Part Selection Query (Part 2)
|
|
Hi Micheal, I am wondering if it would be possible to use an unique identifier for each part belonging to a specific funcionality in the model. With this I mean: I would like to model for example the Technic Space Shuttle in MLCad and to see only (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
|
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) 1-n (...) present (...) we (...) of (...) not (...) In the main, I think they really are part numbers, considering the total number of parts there are very few exceptions, which I think can be explained by 1) some technical need for separate (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | May I get train track dat file?
|
|
(24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: 6180 4 x 6 with studs on Edges
|
|
I found it using add parts with 6180.dat, but I can't find it in plate list. Zhengrong (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Complete Figure Shortcuts for LegoCAD. [DAT]
|
|
(...) That does remind me of something. Did you receive the last 2 elements I sent Sunday? (4212A.dat and 2336p35.dat) James J. P.S.: Here is a preview of my work. P.P.S.: Future Editions may require my Solid Minifig Head prototype. ((URL) Minifig (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: <snippage> (...) All along we have been using these numbers as 'part numbers', when actually they appear to be a mould number. What we are finding here is that there are 1-n mould numbers for each 'part shape'. (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) p/n (...) angle. (...) is (...) Good analysis, Steve - I agree wholeheartedly - Chris (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|