 | | Re: Do we need public part submission information ?
|
|
(...) good (...) you (...) your (...) This is key information for the Authoring FAQ, and probably taken for granted by authors who have been around a while. Unless you object I'd like to use some of your text for the FAQ. Chris (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we need public part submission information ?
|
|
(...) Here is some expantion of point 2: I've added sentence 3, 4 and 5 2- Format of the obligatory part header: 0 <part description> 0 <part number>.dat 0 <Author> 0 Un-Official Element Replace any <...> with the appropriate information. The length (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: November LDraw MOTM competition
|
|
(...) :-) Pretty dramatic, I must say. I'm still alive and kicking. I see you've been busy - congrats on your CLSotW. I voted for you. Great site - very slick, I loved it. And it's good to see you're still tinkering with dat files - is your Datsort (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Yet another L3PAO update
|
|
Version 1.2.5 is up. I added a (much-requested) command line textbox that shows the output before it is sent to L3P. This allows the user to see exactly what every switch and checkbox does as s/he changes settings. As always, here's the place: (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New renderings
|
|
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 16:04:59 -0600, Jay Jacinto wrote (in message <G30AoB.Byx@lugnet.com>): (...) Looks great Jay! Keep up the great work! Ben (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space)
|
