|
|
 | | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
| (...) No, it's a good thing to have a program to identify these things. Even though edges-only primitives can't be BFC'ed, I'm guessing there could be other advantages to avoiding singular matrices, and few disadvantages. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
| (...) OK, that sounds reasonable -- it's something that a clean-up program could look for, even though it's not practical for a rendering program to do the same. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
| (...) Whew! Only one of those files is mine! :\ (...) True. (...) I don't think that's necessary. If a subfile is not certified, then the renderer will not apply BFC processing to the subfile. Besides, if having all subfiles certified was a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: StarWars rendered images
|
| (...) Those are awesome! I was just showing them to everyone at work. KL (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| | | | | Smoke-Clear color code (was: Problem with 1-4con1.dat)
|
| (...) I don't think there is a sanctioned color-code yet ... checking ... checking ... nope, nothing in the color table in the FAQ. Hear Ye! Hear Ye! Unless someone complains otherwise, the proper LDraw color-code for 'smoked-transparent', AKA (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
|
