 | | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
(...) Thanks for clearing that up! In that case, I'll submit the 756.dat I just posted to lugnet.cad.dat.parts to Steve Bliss. Since it is an improvement of an existing part, it shouldn't require a vote, right? Fredrik (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrd7lduwl4w.fsf....uio.no... (...) I updated the 754.dat to make it more realistic, but obviously failed to do so for 756. Feel free to improve the 756.dat! -John Van (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) In my experience, L3Lab works almost perfectly with Wine under GNU/Linux. LDLITE, on the other hand, works just barely under Wine, and I've never managed to run LDraw at all under neither Wine nor DOSEMU. I would really like to run LEdit under (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) I tried to play a little with l3lab running under wine, and it seems to run, but I didn't have time to play with it more... :) Dan (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: ldlite
|
|
(...) Kevin - email it to me? ;) Dan (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Updated version of official part 756.dat [DAT]
|
|
Here is my suggestion for an update of the part 756.dat. See my post (URL) a background story on why I think it should be updated. You may worry that this part, having more rounded shapes and more polygons, will make the rendering of a hose more CPU (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) AFAIK, TLG hasn't said anything officially regarding LDraw or its parts libraries. I believe LDraw as a freeware program is well within its rights to contain SW elements as well. They aren't making official statements about it (IMO) because (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I meant to say "no point _for_me_ to discuss anymore". Sorry for sounding harsh. (...) I still don't agree. But as I said (or rather meant to say, English isn't my primary language, so I sometimes goof) we probably don't need to discuss this (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I only used eight, to simplify the drawing, which was made by hand. (...) All I say is that the benefits from it overweight the extra effort. (...) Correct, Can't argue with that ! But this problem surfaces, due to the intrinsic polygonized (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with 1-4con1.dat
|
|
(...) I am using the color definitions from Anton's Lego library and these are the closest to real Lego colors i have seen. The only exception is black and transparent black that should be <0.2,0.2,0.2> Georg (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
