 | | Re: comments on parts up for vote- part jg1
|
|
(...) [ detail snippped ] (...) Thanks a lot for tracking these down - I guess its clear how I generated all these from one master pattern (with the error)! I'll fix them all and send updates to Steve. The one remaining part is the 3x6 shallow slope (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) I'll fix the singular matrices - this was authored before L3Lab was publicly available. It was also done in the expectation that the matching door-frame would be sent in for the voting (don't remember who by). Maybe I'll put that on my work (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote in message news:Pine.GSU.4.10.1...0@is-sv... (...) Superimposed polys are allowed, AFAIK. Maybe not the most elegant solution, but they render fine. (...) petals, (...) better (...) aprxomiation (...) I've (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
Another file - [3471.dat] This file has a lot of work on it, but still has some problems, specifically almost all the quads from the base are bowties. See the following image: (URL) there are a few (maybe many, but few as far as our yes can see) (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I have been able to test only a few parts iet, but here are my findings: - [flowers.dat] This file shows superimposed polys (tris and quads) in the petals of the flower, this is a problem in the flower itself (3742.dat), not in the flowers.dat (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | question about Datsville [DAT]
|
|
Hello. I am new to ldraw and I have a question about the models submitted to be considered part of Datsville. Do you have to be able to make the model in real life to be considered or does it just have to look possible in ldraw? Attached is a file (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone modeling the Battle Droid?
|
|
Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:38F49719.9B288B...ail.com... (...) I'll (...) Nah, it's too much of a pain. Too many intersecting cylinders. The R2 body might be a good candidate for Marc with his real CAD program. (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone modeling the Battle Droid?
|
|
(...) Please finish the r2 unit first, ok. (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30228.dat Minifig Tool Motor Hammer
|
|
Great part, tore. A better name for it would be minifig tool jackhammer or minifig tool pnuematic drill. (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30228.dat Minifig Tool Motor Hammer
|
|
Most of this part is modeled with color 8. Was this intentional? -John Van Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> wrote in message news:38F4823C.CE4A8B...pnet.se... (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
