|
|
 | | Arm size an issue? (Was: YAL: Yet Another Loader :))
|
| (...) LOL -- Barbara's first words after seeing my loader were, "it's a crab? no, is it a gorilla?" I think that means the arms were too big. :-, (...) Yah, it does seem silly to put such large arms on a walking loader. The arms I put on mine, and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| I love the loader, but the minifig seems to hav had a melt down. When I load it into mlcad, or convert it with L3P, the minifig parts are all stacked on top of each other like they were not transformed or rotated. Is anyone else seing this? -Chuck (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: META commands ??? (was "Re: new part - 71014 Castle Greatsword")
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: <SNIP> (...) <SNIP> (...) MLCad documentation about meta-commands is available in the MLCad help files, included in the program package itself. Michael (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: YAL: Yet Another Loader :)
|
| (...) I like it. Love the legs, love the rollbars. And, given a powerful enough auto-balancing system, it looks like it could do a mean sprint. ;-) Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| | | | | Re: More MPD
|
| I think this goes back to the discussion (from last week, I think) about the MPD format, and if it does everything needed, and if there should be changes to it, or a new file format. To handle nested files, and sub-mpd files, I'd go for a new (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
