 | | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
| (...) Yeah. How about: Martians I actually have been meaning to post that after getting all the LoM sets (apart from the big base, which no one seems to have found yet) I quite like the martians, which surprises me, because frankly I expected to (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
| (...) You miss the point. I am talking about a name for the whole class of figs, which would include martians, battle droids, and whatever else Lego comes out with in the future that uses this construction style. (...) I'm OK with the look of the (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
| (...) Well, there's "mikifigs" (partly in honor of the fact that Senor Raton is built in the same, um, mickeymouse fashion). Since we have CRAPPs and POOPs, how 'bout Figs Absent Redeeming Traits? (...) This is more serious for Martians than for (...) (24 years ago, 10-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
| (...) Not bad- FARTs. That could work. Or how about Weak Tiny Figures? (I'm still attached to "suckifigs", though.) (...) Agreed. (...) Good point... but it begs the question: If you really want your aliens to look different then why do they have 2 (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
| |
