Subject:
|
Re: Getting Value from Locker 99 Minifig Reference?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.minifigs
|
Date:
|
Sat, 29 Jun 2002 23:12:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3391 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> For about 2 years now, I've been SLOWLY building up
> a reference tool on minifigs, which I saw as kind of
> a follow-on to the information presented in the old
> Fibblesnork guide.
>
> My site is at
>
> http://home.att.net/~locker99/index.htm
> So the question is -- is anyone getting any value out
> of Locker 99 anymore as a refernce for minifigs -- i.e.,
> is it "worth it" to anyone for me to continue building it
> up? I've had fun doing it up to this point, but it is
> time consuming to put the detail work into it that I do.
I wouldn't say that I use it every day, but Locker 99 is definitely on my
list of Lego reference pages. One concrete way I remember using it was to
confirm that yes, there were three different Hydronaut heads. . .
--
TWS Garrison
http://www.math.purdue.edu/~tgarriso/
Remove capital letters in address for direct reply.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Getting Value from Locker 99 Minifig Reference?
|
| For about 2 years now, I've been SLOWLY building up a reference tool on minifigs, which I saw as kind of a follow-on to the information presented in the old Fibblesnork guide. My site is at (URL) I've done, that I haven't seen done elsewhere, is to (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.build.minifigs)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
