To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 51
50  |  52
Subject: 
Re: Revisiting one more existing MOC
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 01:13:25 GMT
Viewed: 
340 times
  
In lugnet.build.military, Shaun Sullivan writes:
In lugnet.build.military, Joel Jacobsen writes:

<snipped>

I recall seeing this before, but I don't think you had the RL photos up at the
time.  It looks great (both in RL and your versions) ... I've always loved
armored cars!  Yeah, treads are impressive and don't spin out and all that, but
look at those wheels ...

I originally didn't have the RL pictures there -- that's something I credit
you with, Shaun. After seeing your RL comparisons for your WWII MOC's I
realized how helpful it is to be able to compare. :)

I recall reading an article about the next generation
of these, and how they were going to be taking a larger role in the military.
Obviously, they can't compete in major face-offs against tanks, but in the new
world order, they are looking more and more attractive.

I remember first seeing an article about the LAV in some magazine in the mid
80's and thinking "Bradley schmadley.. THIS is the Infantry vehicle I'd want
to be in...!" :) And the nickname Pirhana is just too sweet anyway. :)

Conflicts are becoming
faster and more fleeting, mobility continues to develop (STEP 1: trenches to
Blitzkrieg.  STEP 2: Lumbering Tanks to darting armored cars?), and military
pricetags are coming under increasing scrutiny.  And the nature of engagements
are changing ... it's harder to get a whole slieu of tanks anywhere in the
world quickly, whereas these were light enough to be air-lifted in respectable
numbers anywhere, and then were fast enough and had a long enough range to
be a presence anywhere in x hours (x being a number I've forgotten, but
considerably less than a corresponding tank deployment).  And given a nice 90mm
main gun, it's not as if they're useless in an alley fight, either.

Actually, the LAV-III picture I have in my gallery is sporting a 105mm gun. ;)

I 'decided' mine was a 90mm because I also wanted to have the 'chain gun'
because the links arcing over the side as the belt feed just looked too cool
NOT to use but as a main gun it looked too wimpy. ;)

I've seen information indicating the 2nd AND 3rd generation LAV's are to
have varients with the 105mm gun -- it's powerful enough for ground
support/building clearing and they're talking about mounting the Javelin
Anti Tank Guided Missle as well so it can take out a T-80 even. It's looks
to finally be a wheeled version of a Bradley with a better profile, less
risk of immobilization (how do you throw a track when you haven't got any?)
and still provide the role of "Battle Taxi" to our troops.


Great work, Joel ... hopefully its demise will serve a higher cause.

Thanks, and I hope so. I don't have any of the large technic tank treads or
I'd try for a tank to go with my LAV, or a Bradley, but we'll see.


I still drool at pictures of the Sd.Kfz 221 and 222 *slurp*.  My rendition
is too large by a fair amount, but I still keep it around out of affection.

I hear ya -- with what you've made, I'd keep them built if possible, too. I
just need the bricks for other ventures soon. :)

That reminds me - anybody else ever play Panzer Leader or PanzerBlitz?  The
look of uninhibited shock on the other player's face ... "what do you mean you
can go 18 hexes, 36 on roads?"  ... priceless :P

I never played them, but I did play a (very) little bit of Rise and Decline
of the 3rd Reich -- it was about the same with the Panzer units. ;)

By the way, you can buy decommisioned armored cars (well, and tanks and
anything else, really) from various vendors.  I've always daydreamed about
picking up a British Ferret for a measly $20k.  Imagine driving down your
street - it's even enough to make hummers skirt out of the way, I suppose ;)

-s

LOL -- that WOULD be amusing... I'd enjoy driving one of those to work... at
least people would be more inclined to give me right of way. :)

Joel J



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Revisiting one more existing MOC
 
(...) I recall seeing this before, but I don't think you had the RL photos up at the time. It looks great (both in RL and your versions) ... I've always loved armored cars! Yeah, treads are impressive and don't spin out and all that, but look at (...) (23 years ago, 6-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR