To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 364
363  |  365
Subject: 
Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:33:25 GMT
Viewed: 
140 times
  
In lugnet.build.sculpture, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> In lugnet.build.sculpture, George Haberberger writes:
> > In lugnet.build.sculpture, Mike Case writes:
> > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 05:19:42 GMT, "Mark" <snowleopard@foxinternet.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > It is a nice kit, very detailed.  Just one gripe, this baby packs tons of
> > > > torque, when you spin the props, the engine spins with it.  I thought  it
> > > > was kind of a cheap maneuver but it does look good and there certainly are
> > > > ways to work around it if you want the prop to spin freely.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Wasn't this an intentional part of the design?  I had thought that the
> > > radial engines of that era rotated around a central shaft just like
> > > the model.
> > > 
> > > Mike
> > 
> > If the engine spins with the propellor, then it is a rotary engine, and it
> > is correct, see this link for more detail,
> > http://www.theaerodrome.com/aircraft/gbritain/sopwith/camel.html .
> > 
> > In reality, the rotary engine packed so much torque that inexperience pilots
> > routinely crashed flying the Camel. Experienced pilots knew how to
> > compensate for it, and used the torque to their advantage, amking the Camel
> > extremely manueverable. Often, a pilot would turn 240 degrees one way to
> > make a 120 degree turn the other way, there was that much torque.
> > 
> > There was a discussion about rotary and radial engines in lugnet.military
> > not too long ago.
> 
>   I've been trying to find a diagram of the old rotary engine,
>   but searches always bring up the Wankel engine, which isn't
>   nearly the same thing.  I'm trying to get a sense for how
>   much of the engine rotated, and how fuel delivery was done if
>   the cylinders were spinning.  To be honest, I didn't think that
>   the engine *did* spin, but I've never seen a running rotary
>   engine (!!) so I can't speak from experience.
> 
>   Anyone have any good information/references?
> 
>   best
> 
>   LFB

Try "radial engine" or "radial rotary engine"
the more correct term for the engine type in
your search.

Best
DaveG



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
 
(...) I have two great books I found at Borders Books a few weeks ago. They are the "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft" and "Illustrated Encyclopedia of Civil Aircraft" both by Enzo Angelucci. Between these two books they have most every (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Opinion on the Sopwith Camel?
 
(...) I've been trying to find a diagram of the old rotary engine, but searches always bring up the Wankel engine, which isn't nearly the same thing. I'm trying to get a sense for how much of the engine rotated, and how fuel delivery was done if the (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.build.military)

11 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR