|
You really solved some tricky problems in that hull! The shape of the deck is
very complex and you managed to capture it.
I have never seen the a picture of the Enterprises hull and keel, so I cant
comment on accuracy. But I think Id prefer a waterline version because it looks
so much sleeker and less clumsy.
Any chance of bringing the whole thing more to life by adding some micro-scale
planes? Or is the scale just too small?
Mark
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: USS Enterprise aircraft carrier, version 2.
|
| (...) well, version 1 was waterline and upwards only, link: (URL) and yes, the scale is to small to make microscale planes, they'd need to be somethin like 2 studs long and 1.5 studs wide, which would be just a little bit hard to do. thanks! -mark (20 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | USS Enterprise aircraft carrier, version 2.
|
| They say a picture is worth a thousand words, and I don't have time to type that many, so here yah go. (URL) It's been a little over a year since I posted my first Enterprise, and it had been sitting on my shelf, gathering dust, missing small parts (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.build.military, FTX) !
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|