To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 1148
1147  |  1149
Subject: 
Bofors Quad 40
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Sun, 16 Feb 2003 13:01:54 GMT
Viewed: 
898 times
  
In lugnet.build.military, Daniel Siskind writes:
In lugnet.build, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
In lugnet.build, Daniel Siskind writes:

http://www.brickmania.com/Gallery2/war/Bofers.html

Perhaps I'm being unrealistic, but I've scaled my plans to match the minifig (1
stud = 1 foot or 4 x 8 plate = 4 x 8 feet). The mounting may actually be
slightly too big, because my plans were blown up from a really tiny drawing.
Your own cruiser is already so big that it probably wouldn't be too big of a
leap to make it minifig scale!

   To be "minifig scale" the ship would have had to be 22 feet
   long.  That's a little bit big, unless I buy a minivan.  ;)

  -How much elevation and depression do you get on the mount?

It goes down to about minus 30 degress, but only elevates to about 65-70 degress
before the ammo release handles hit the back of the mounting.

   That's always the limiting factor.  It was for me, too.

It will be fixed to the deck with a 2x2 turntable. If there is no woble in the
construction (for example tiles around the turntable) then the connection is
remarkably strong. I discovered this when building my Sherman kit as the whole
turret assembly is connected with a single 2x2 turntable and it's almost
imposible to break the connection with the hull floor.  I've posted a quick
snapshot of how I did it on the Quad 40 here:

http://www.brickmania.com/Gallery2/war/Quad40e.jpg

   That's an extremely interesting solution.  Given the
   mass of the mount, I'll be interested to see how it
   pans out when it's actually in situ.  (Lord knows I
   have enough of those 8x8 vent tiles to try it myself!)
   My plan was merely to tile around the mount and hold
   it tight that way, and the problem arose because I
   had the 2x2 turntable on a joint between plates.

   You'll have to let me know on a test mounting how
   strong it is.  I expect that with the blast shield
   in place, that mount will be heavier than anything
   you've ever held on by a 2x2 turntable before.  That
   is what causes the problem, or at least what did
   for me.

   Speaking of the blast shield, that's what I forgot
   to ask before; do you have one mocked (MOCed?) up
   or is that still to come?  It has some very strange
   curves indeed, but it's one of the truly recogniz-
   able features of the Bofors system as used in US
   warships.  It was also effective, especially against
   debris from kamikaze attacks!  (Ask any of the crew
   of the USS Franklin about *that* one!)

   Again, wow.  Wowowowow.

   best

   LFB



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Bofors Quad 40
 
(...) Wow, that's big! Same reason I'm not committing to anything bigger, at least until I buy a house first. (...) Have you tried burying a 4x4 turntable into the works, or even that huge technic turntable? There is also a pretty cool turntable in (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-03, to lugnet.build.military)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bofers Quad 40 and Tanks updates
 
(...) Perhaps I'm being unrealistic, but I've scaled my plans to match the minifig (1 stud = 1 foot or 4 x 8 plate = 4 x 8 feet). The mounting may actually be slightly too big, because my plans were blown up from a really tiny drawing. Your own (...) (22 years ago, 16-Feb-03, to lugnet.build.military)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR