To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 1146
1145  |  1147
Subject: 
Re: Bofers Quad 40 and Tanks updates
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Sun, 16 Feb 2003 01:55:43 GMT
Viewed: 
2321 times
  
In lugnet.build, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> In lugnet.build, Daniel Siskind writes:
> 
> > http://www.brickmania.com/Gallery2/war/Bofers.html
> 
>   Wow.  Wowowowowowow.  Dan, that's *beautiful*.  The
>   tanks are always great, but the 40mm mount is the
>   real star of this update.  But then again, I'm biased. ;)
> 
>   I'm especially impressed that it's in actual minifig
>   scale and not compressed.  I've given some thought to
>   making just a standalone 12.7cm mount just to go to
>   "real" minifig scale, and I think you've just made
>   me think about it yet again.  This really came out
>   beautifully.

Perhaps I'm being unrealistic, but I've scaled my plans to match the minifig (1
stud = 1 foot or 4 x 8 plate = 4 x 8 feet). The mounting may actually be
slightly too big, because my plans were blown up from a really tiny drawing.
Your own cruiser is already so big that it probably wouldn't be too big of a
leap to make it minifig scale!

>   A couple of questions (and, alas, one nitpick):
> 
>   -How much elevation and depression do you get on the mount?

It goes down to about minus 30 degress, but only elevates to about 65-70 degress
before the ammo release handles hit the back of the mounting.

>   -Have you considered how you intend to build the "tub" that
>    always accompanied such mounts on US warships?  (I ask
>    because this is a problem that vexed me, and I finally
>    took the easy way out with saucer bottoms--which you won't
>    be able to do owing to the size of your platform there.)
>    A related question is "how do you plan to fix it to the deck?"
>    If there is some way to make a click link to the base that
>    would be ideal, but I found that 2x2 turntables meant a lot
>    of collecting shed 12.7cm mounts every time I moved the
>    ship.

The platform will be a standard plate and tile job shaped to the approximate
dimension of the circular base.  The side walls will be circular, either made up
from alternating 1x3 bricks/plates and 1x1 round bricks/plates (staggered as
they increase in height) or else made up up completely of 1x4 hing bricks/
plates, depending on the radius of the particular mounting/tub.

It will be fixed to the deck with a 2x2 turntable. If there is no woble in the
construction (for example tiles around the turntable) then the connection is
remarkably strong. I discovered this when building my Sherman kit as the whole
turret assembly is connected with a single 2x2 turntable and it's almost
imposible to break the connection with the hull floor.  I've posted a quick
snapshot of how I did it on the Quad 40 here:

http://www.brickmania.com/Gallery2/war/Quad40e.jpg

>   -I assume the barrel banks are linked, but how "tight" are
>    they?  Are they only moved by hand, and is it reliant on
>    good balance for stability or are the friction pegs enough?

The inside pivot point of each mount is the 1x2 technic brick with axle hole, so
there is actuall a technic axle connecting one side to the other. The outside
pivot point is the standard technic brick and connects to the mount with a
friction pin. While the model is generally in balance, two friction pins will
hold the gun's position even when not in balance, like this picture:

http://www.brickmania.com/Gallery2/war/Quad40g.jpg

>   I recalled your original project was to build a battleship;
>   was that shelved with an eye to making a ship in true minifig
>   scale or do you anticipate compression?

I may have mentioned building a battleship, but I think parts cost has detoured
my plans to a much more affordable model size.

>   Man, is that ever beautiful.  Excellent work as always, Dan.
>   I really can't wait to see which cruiser you settle on building,
>   and then to see the beast evolve.

I'm building a Cleveland class crusier, but you may notice the models I've
worked on so far would also work on an Essex Class carrier (in case I suddenly
become independently wealthy!).

>   best
> 
>   LFB
> 
>   (Oh yeah, the one wee nitpick:  it's spelled "Bofors."  ;) )
>   XFUT -> .build.military



Message has 1 Reply:
  Bofors Quad 40
 
(...) To be "minifig scale" the ship would have had to be 22 feet long. That's a little bit big, unless I buy a minivan. ;) (...) That's always the limiting factor. It was for me, too. (...) mass of the mount, I'll be interested to see how it pans (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-03, to lugnet.build.military)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bofers Quad 40 and Tanks updates
 
(...) tanks are always great, but the 40mm mount is the real star of this update. But then again, I'm biased. ;) I'm especially impressed that it's in actual minifig scale and not compressed. I've given some thought to making just a standalone (...) (24 years ago, 15-Feb-03, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.military)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR