 | | Re: spitfire MOC
|
|
(...) thank you! (...) huh. The closeups show in popup windows-- if you have them surpressed, that could be why. As for Netscape.... what version do you use? I'll make changes when I move the site to a server THAT WORKS! In the meantime, see the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: spitfire MOC
|
|
All right,just to make sure, please DON'T go to the brinkster site. Instead, go here: (URL) see the spitfire I made. >sigh< stuart (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: spitfire MOC
|
|
(...) Well, they actually fold the wrong way-- away from the fuselage, not toward. Neat way to use those (...) oh, yeah, Eric H is tops. In particular, the insignia feature was inspired by the numerals in his grandfather clock MOC. ( (URL) ) Thanks, (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: spitfire MOC
|
|
(...) Well, there's lots of ref online, naturally, and the plane has undergone plenty of subtle changes over its years of service. Thanks for the kind words, though. It's actually remarkably sturdy for the amount of SNOT incorporated. stuart (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: spitfire MOC
|
|
(...) oh, for gosh' sake. I moved my other site from Brinkster for this same reason, and I've had it. I took your advice and here's where you can see the dope: (URL) for letting me know, though. Much appreciated. stuart (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: spitfire MOC
|
|
(...) However, I had some trouble with the site: I couldn't load that page in Netscape. It works fine in Internet Exploiter, but in Netscape there's a problem loading your stylesheet. Also, even in IE, I can't view the closeup images. --Bill. (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: spitfire MOC
|
|
Arrrrr!!! Avast ye Brinkster, and prepare for boarding! Your evil Brinkster account has reached its daily bandwith limit. So I have to wait until tomorrow to see it. Just a suggestion, you should use BrickShelf.com. Its free, easy, and good for Lego (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: spitfire MOC
|
|
(...) I'm not particularly familiar with the real Spitfire, but that's a great plane model. Wonderful SNOT (Studs-Not-On-Top) usage! -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: spitfire MOC
|
|
Hey, the landing gear are'nt that bad, it's good. Neat way to use those windsheilds right! The way you made the insignia is definetley a cool technique. Kudos to Eric H. for that and to you too. nice. Eric (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | spitfire MOC
|
|
Hey people, My son recently got interested in some war-era comics (!) and wanted some planes with which to dogfight. I complied with this: (URL) know there are inaccuracies (the cockpit way too wide, the landing gear just a last minute add-on, and (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Vought F-4 Corsair
|
|
(...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: "Loiterer" Anti-Tank/Mecha Helicopter"
|
|
Thanks Tom! Yeah, the blades should be longer... Oh well... Maybe next time... ;-D (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: "Loiterer" Anti-Tank/Mecha Helicopter"
|
|
Beautifully done! I guess my only suggestion is to lengthen the blades on the rotor. Very cool looking and a very interesting form. Love those tail fins monted on the wings. Looks like it packs quite a punch, too. ~ Tom -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
(...) (URL) want to cut & paste since I'm sure the URL got wrapped. They are available from Pitsco-Dacta. $7.00 US for 36 pieces. A little pricy, but they are very useful. -Duane (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: My new work "M4A1 Sherman"
|
|
I love the detail on the model. That is an awesome tank. You are a great inspiration to the rest of us. (i must give you credit and say that your German FW-190 inspired my BF 109.) I have one question; I've seen that type of treads used on many (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: "Loiterer" Anti-Tank/Mecha Helicopter"
|
|
(...) Hmmm... Ahhh... Thanks Kyle! ;-D (...) (URL) (...) rotor. (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: "Loiterer" Anti-Tank/Mecha Helicopter"
|
|
Cooool. Mmmmmm hmmmmm. Weapons .........nice Shape .........coool Greebles .........even in a atmospheic model .........cooool Something that I have been waiting for someone to make .........yay! :-D Keppler Industries approves... (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: "Loiterer" Anti-Tank/Mecha Helicopter"
|
|
(...) rotor. (...) thing? Read this page: (URL) it is "safer, more reliable and quieter". BTW what did you think my MOC? (...) Mladen Pejic, over and out! (URL) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: "Loiterer" Anti-Tank/Mecha Helicopter"
|
|
(...) Heh... Thanks Eric! People really seem to like them! ;-) (...) Mladen Pejic, over and out! (URL) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: "Loiterer" Anti-Tank/Mecha Helicopter"
|
|
(...) What improvments does NOTAR offer? I saw a helicopter with a tail like that, and it rotate in place, and flip it self over. Did I see the same thing? (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
