 | | Re: F-4u Corsair
|
|
(...) It has too much of a vertical incline for the SW canopy, there isn't anything yet produced that mimicks it that well, I geuss the SW canopy is the best. -Geordan- (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Other appropriate MOCs...
|
|
(...) thing that seems maybe a smidge out of place are the landing gear. They just seem a tad too small -- but who cares? My Corsair has something dogfight with now! ;) (...) just plain awesome! I love the colors and the wing design. It's all great! (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: F-4u Corsair
|
|
(...) Thanks Geordan! It worked well for "revision 1" though there aren't many options for the canopy that I like. The SW canopy is "okay" but just not quite right. Ah well. :) You've inpsired me to put it on the plate for a redesign in the near (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Clarify Appropriate Posts
|
|
(...) ok, sounds cool, -Geordan- (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: A dream come true...
|
|
(...) Great I look forward to seeing them, the b-52 sounds interesting, as far as large scale bombers go, I wanna get a b-17 done sometime, although I have enough on my plate now as it is. Hope to see them soon! -Geordan- (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | my lego military
|
|
Here is my military, i've been laging a bit on it lately, I've been updateing to 8-wide trains. (URL) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Other appropriate MOCs...
|
|
(tiny) Zero: (URL) Shrike Interceptor: (URL) category on my site most appropriate to military: (URL) Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (URL) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Clarify Appropriate Posts
|
|
(...) Nice try Geordan, but I refuse to be responsible :D Just like any other area in lugnet, this is a community-based (and policed, for that matter, outside of those rare instances necessitating admin involvement) newgroup. I don't make decisions, (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | A dream come true...
|
|
A great day. To finally see a military build group. And to see my MOC page linked up. Flattered. Some models on my mind that you can expect to see from me: A10 Warthog B-52 Stratofortress [ (URL) ] Best regards, Marc (URL) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | P-51 Teaser
|
|
I couldn't wait, here's da teaser, full pics to come in a few days... (URL) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Clarify Appropriate Posts
|
|
(...) I don't want to answer for Shaun but personally I think that any type of military themed creations belong here. Weather it be an original creation or a true representation of your favourite aircraft, I don't mind. (but other's may/may not. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: WWII MOC: Focke Wulf
|
|
(...) Um, the warthog is beautiful ONLY in the way that any "form follows function" design that hits (in this case, NAILS) its design goals is beautiful. It's *not* beautiful the way, say, a Jag E type is. (E types aren't very functional, trust me. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Clarify Appropriate Posts
|
|
Is this the place to post original militaly MOCs? Or is only "reality" based MOCs appropriate? Shawn (URL) you empower the victims, what would the predators have to do (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New Newsgroup: lugnet.build.military
|
|
(...) Hehe, Hankinson, sorry,(URL) post ((URL) and the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: F-4u Corsair
|
|
Great work! this is definitely a good model, the diorama is neat to, Hope to see more from you Joel! As this is a very good model, -Geordan- (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New Newsgroup: lugnet.build.military
|
|
(...) out (...) Oops - it's definitely worth noting that the plan did come out of Geordan Ballantree's post ((URL) and the support that sprung up for the idea! -s (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: WWII MOC: Focke Wulf
|
|
(...) Thanks Lindsay, It is hard to resist, but some planes (like this one) would look goofy with it. (...) I'll have to see if my library has it, I think I've checked out prettymuch all of the WWII aircraft resource books over the past month or so, (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New Newsgroup: lugnet.build.military
|
|
(...) (URL) Anyways, great news--it's making me want to get back to my (...) Yah! I can't wait to see it! -Geordan- (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: New Newsgroup: lugnet.build.military
|
|
[snip] (...) Well, there was much back-door dealing, and I have apparently abdicated all rights to my first offspring. Actually, the all-powerful Lugnet Admins were very accomodating .. I e-mailed with a post outlining a concrete request with (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: WWII MOC: Focke Wulf
|
|
(...) Hmm, wish me luck. I saw this two weeks ago at a used bookstore in downtown Portsmouth, but passed it up at the time. I'm fixin' to head back down during my lunch break, with all intentions of snapping it up. Hopefully it's still there ... (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.military)
|
