Subject:
|
Re: New quad-legged MOC: Barghest
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 04:39:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1653 times
|
| |
|
|
James,
very nice. saw it already, but it's still nice. btw...if the teeth were
chrome, i think it'd look better. i don't know howto do that in
mlcad/pov-ray, but i know i've seen it (i think one of Primus Bus' mechs.)
nice though. 4-leggers are a favorite of mine, though mine are big, bulky,
and slow. i'm going to attempt a 4 legger that is sorta a mix between yours
and a spider mecha style.
-austin
btw, what was your first mecha venture?
In lugnet.build.mecha, James Davis writes:
> Recently I ventured into the Mecha construction field yet again, and have
> produced a four-legger which I am very proud of.
>
> http://www.icounsel.com/blacktron/Prefecture/forces/army/mechs/barghest.htm
>
> There are two flaws with the DAT. I could not correcly align the technic
> springs with the legs, so they appear slightly skewed.
> The tail which is on the real-brick model is missing in the DAT. I intend
> to put it in eventually, but it would be hidden from the render angles I
> use.
>
> The real-brick model has a poor front-foot design, which I correct in the
> DAT. The real-brick model is also badly colored, which I hope to correct
> over time as I browse through my badly-sorted collection.
>
> Both DAT renders and real-brick photos are available at the URL.
> Comments are appreciated.
>
>
> Regards,
> James
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | New quad-legged MOC: Barghest
|
| Recently I ventured into the Mecha construction field yet again, and have produced a four-legger which I am very proud of. (URL) are two flaws with the DAT. I could not correcly align the technic springs with the legs, so they appear slightly (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
