 | | Re: Fire Skull - an armored dragon —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) Excellent effort ;) He's obviously a fast learner. (...) Thank you. I've been very lazy about posting stuff to LUGNET lately because I tend to get so few replies but I'm glad you found it. (...) Tim (16 years ago, 16-May-08, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Fire Skull - an armored dragon —Marco Tagliaferri
|
| | | | (...) Hi Tim, I also found it got very calm around here. I remember the days when .mecha was one of the top traffic groups on Lugnet. Don't get me wrong, I'm talking of the times when traffic was produced by MoC replies not flame wars. Well those (...) (16 years ago, 18-May-08, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fire Skull - an armored dragon —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) Do you have a (URL) flickr> account yet, Marco? Pretty much all the mecha discussion has moved over there now. Even the Mechahub forums were closed to move it to flickr. I think that the richness of the flickr interface really makes discussing (...) (16 years ago, 19-May-08, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fire Skull - an armored dragon —Fradel D. Gonzales
|
| | | | (...) I too miss the halcyon days of .Mecha. By the time I got into the genre, .Mecha and Lugnet were already winding down. Part of the problem lies with the Provisional Council who failed to deliver on the promises of an upgraded system. I still (...) (16 years ago, 4-Jun-08, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| | | | |
