 | | Re: Disparaging remaks and charges of being elitist —Nathan Proudlove
|
| | | So, my guess is that this post will go generally unnoticed by the majority of the established fan community. The reason, I believe, is that my name is not known very well yet. I have been developing theories about the number and nature of responses (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-06, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Disparaging remaks and charges of being elitist —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | (...) --SNIP-- I noticed it. You forgot the last rule 5) Reply to a controversial thread Tim ;) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-06, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Disparaging remaks and charges of being elitist —Nathan Proudlove
|
| | | | | | (...) Chuckle, whoops. Thanks for pointing that out. I guess we are all guilty of a little trolling. Nathan (18 years ago, 7-Feb-06, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Disparaging remaks and charges of being elitist —Marco Tagliaferri
|
| | | | | In lugnet.build.mecha, Nathan Proudlove wrote: Hello Nathan, hello LUGNet, hello who ever will read this! When I read the initial post by Eric, I thought to myself he's right in some of his points and he's off in some others. I didn't want to chime (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-06, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Disparaging remaks and charges of being elitist —Jon Walden
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure you'd be correct on that. I find that fresh insight tends to be very helpful. (...) You have a good point, but you might want to take into consideration some of us have waited years before we posted anything on Lugnet because this (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-06, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | |
