|
|
 | | Re: articulation points?
|
| i never really gave it a thought about the hand not having rotation of its own accord, but rather gets it from the elbow. that solves a huge problem i'm having with my mech. you see, i'm having difficulty with my mech holding his weapon because it's (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: New MOC: Ravage G1 Transfomer
|
| (...) I actually tried to stop it loading in my browser when I realised that at the last second :) (...) No, that IS a real suggestion. I might try it, especially since the design is very simple. More prototying in gray :) (...) Hmm. I'm not sure if (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: New GA! (well sort of new)
|
| Very cool. I'm not really big into the bionocle type stuff, but I'm always amazed to see what everyone does with them. -Anne (...) -- Conformity: Proudly (\`--/') _ _______ .-r-. serving painfully boring >.~.\ `` ` `,`,`. ,'_'~`. people since time (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: New MOC: Ravage G1 Transfomer URL
|
| (...) Nice, but to me, all transformers MUST transform to be called TRANSFORMers... :-) It still is a nice little panther though! Ravage shouldn't be that hard to make transformable. Anne, I bet you can do it ! Terry (22 years ago, 20-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: articulation points?
|
| (...) I think you've hit the nail on the head here Eric. To me, the most logical way of looking at a robot arm would be from the point of view of the end effector, i.e. what it can and cannot do. The way the arm moves to get there may be of less (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.technic)
|
|
