|
|
 | | Re: What is a mech supposed.........
|
| "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:G2xrxs.L67@lugnet.com... (...) legs, for (...) the (...) would (...) as (...) Is there a reason this thread is in lugnet.town? FUT: lugnet.build.mecha Mike - mike_walsh@mindspring.com (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.town, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: Rock Raiders Mecha
|
| It stands up fairly well, though it may not look it. The only problem I've noticed isn't the stability of the feet, but the looseness of the TB ball-socket joints at the hips. I suppose if I put the hips under the center of gravity, it would work (...) (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.underground)
| | | | | Re: What is a mech supposed.........
|
| In lugnet.town, Shaun Sullivan writes (...) How about Episodes 5 and 6 of Star Wars? Do AT-ATs and AT-STs qualify as mechs? Dave! (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.town, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: What is a mech supposed.........
|
| (...) for (...) have (...) out of (...) That was episode 7 Double Vision. That is a cool episode, to bad the new series is not as good. Well back to work, have a good one. Mike (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.town, lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: Question ??
|
| (...) Thanks for checking Rick. I went to the site using Netscape and it's fine but with AOL it's a no go. I'll have to investigate my computer a little. Mike (25 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
|
