Subject:
|
Re: Suspension Bridge
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.arch
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 02:00:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4511 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.arch, Constantine Hannaher writes:
> In lugnet.build.arch, Patrick O'Donnell writes:
> > I got a scanner for my birthday on March 9 and I'm now getting around to
> > posting my pics of a suspension bridge I built nearly 8 years ago! This is
> > my first attempt at putting something on BrickShelf.
> >
> > There are four pictures in this folder. The first was taken in my basement,
> > and the remaining three were taken while the bridge was on display at the
> > elementary school where my wife teaches. In viewing my pics on BrickShelf I
> > have a few questions. I'd appreciate if someone can be of assistance.
> >
> > #1 Why is the quility of the last three pictures so poor as compared to the
> > first picture?
> >
> > #2 Why do the pictures appear massive - how can I make them to fit the
> > screen like most everybody elses?
>
> You don't say whether you're scanning prints or scanning negatives, but I
> wonder if your scanner/software combination is delivering a higher resolution
> than you were expecting, say 150dpi, rather than the 72 or 96 usually used for
> web graphics. Thanks for giving members of WamaLTC a preview of these last
> month!
>
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=37444
>
> <snip>
Hello Constantine,
First, I enjoyed visiting your club's display at the Equestrian Center. It
was worth the 3 hour drive to view what you in the WamaLTC have set up! If
my memory serves me right - you were the one with the digital camera taking
pictures most of the time. I thought I would make it to your next meeting,
but I can't even get to a meeting of AFOL's here in central PA within an
hour's drive of me. See this from Larry P. a few days ago.
http://news.lugnet.com/loc/us/pa/phi/har/?n=116
I'm scanning prints. The prints are fine, as you viewed them yourself. I
know they're not professional. They look great in my folder here on my
computer. It's just when I upload it to BrickShelf I loose the quality.
I've even E-mailed them to myself and I'm getting excellent results and
they're the right size too. I'll figure it out.
Take Care,
Patrick
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Suspension Bridge
|
| (...) You don't say whether you're scanning prints or scanning negatives, but I wonder if your scanner/software combination is delivering a higher resolution than you were expecting, say 150dpi, rather than the 72 or 96 usually used for web (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.arch)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
