Subject:
|
Re: New Building (light gray)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.arch
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Sep 2001 13:54:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
306 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build, Jason Spears writes:
...
> Neat. All those thinwalls are pretty impressive. How sturdy is this? It
> looks extremely fragile.
My question as well. I have built a number of large buildings for train
shows that have traveled with varying success. How do you plan to transport
it -- or is it stronger than it looks?
So far I've tried wrapping with bubble wrap, and constructing thin-sheet
styofoam shells. Both work. For buildings without a lot of protrusions, the
strofoam shells are much easier to get off and on the building once they're
made. I also put foam inside buildings to keep them from collapsing during
transport. Most buildings have to be transported upright; even with the
packing and wrapping, they split apart if they're on their side.
You can unquestionably follow up to trains.org for this reply :)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Building (light gray)
|
| (...) I'm assuming floors would add a lot of strength... as well as adding to the realism (even if undetailed... a big hollow shell doesn't look right unless it's supposed to be a big hollow atrium) (...) So do you have a custom carved shell you use (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Building (light gray)
|
| (...) Neat. All those thinwalls are pretty impressive. How sturdy is this? It looks extremely fragile. <snip> -Jason PS Maybe you could have a little train car (2 wide or something) next to each of your buildings so the "FUT Police" wouldn't harass (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
