Subject:
|
Re: The Brick Testament begins the Book of Joshua
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.ancient
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:01:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3094 times
|
| |
|
|
Not to nit-pick, but Joshua 3:15-16 says "As soon as the feet of the priests
carrying the ark of the covenant touched the water, the water coming downstream
toward them stopped". You portray the water piled up both upstream and
downstream, rather like crossing the Red Sea.
Shouldn't we assume that the water flowing downstream continued to flow away
since there is no mention of it stopping? Thus the water should be portrayed
more like a single wall/dam of water on the upstream side only, rather than like
a canyon of water...
-Matt :)
(who loves your work and insists on accuracey)
In lugnet.announce.moc, Brendan Powell Smith wrote:
> The Brick Testament website has been updated today with three new illustrated
> stories which begin the Book of Joshua:
>
> http://bricktestament.com/joshua
>
> or
>
> http://bricktestament.com/latest_additions
>
> (NOTE: For anyone unfamiliar with The Brick Testament or the Bible, please take
> note of the content warnings for the stories before viewing.)
>
> Enjoy,
>
> -The Rev. Brendan Powell Smith
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Brick Testament begins the Book of Joshua
|
| Hi, Matthew. (...) I've reviewed the passages describing the parting of the Jordan, and while the text doesn't rule out that the water piled up downstream as well, I have to agree that it would make more sense to portray this scene with only one (...) (20 years ago, 20-Aug-04, to lugnet.build.ancient, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
