 | | Re: The Brick Testament: More Laws than You Can Shake a Stick At
|
|
(...) I figured that was the intent, it just didn't work as well for me. (...) I'm not saying this was an invalid interpretation. As I noted in my reply to Lenny, I think that the Sanhedren's condemnation of Christ was based on this passage, or (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.build.ancient)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament: More Laws than You Can Shake a Stick At
|
|
(...) Okay, so I just looked up "smirk" in my dictionary and I should have written just plain ol' "smile". No harm intended, not for Brendan (suggesting he likes to mock) or the Christians! /Tobbe (23 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.build.ancient)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament: More Laws than You Can Shake a Stick At
|
|
(...) Slavery Ex 21:2 Great cuffs! The chair in pic 2 is nice! The carpet with all those pins, that's a new idea. Ex 21:7 Good caravan, fitting hair too :) The "Don't forget to write line" is hillarious and very fitting. Ex 21:8 Your beds are (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.build.ancient)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament: More Laws than You Can Shake a Stick At
|
|
(...) Thanks, Chris. (...) That's the IV drip bag, which is a crystal ball turned upside down. (...) It was fun to figure out what a pile of loot should look like. (...) You could take out the whole part about the "false prophet" being Jesus, and I (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.build.ancient)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament: More Laws than You Can Shake a Stick At
|
|
Hi, Leonard. (...) As I mentioned in my reply to Bruce, it wasn't meant to be offensive, but it certainly does challenge the Christian view of things. If that, in and of itself, is offensive to some people, well so be it. I think a devout Christian (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.build.ancient, FTX)
|
