Subject:
|
Re: LEGO DNA Sculpture
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 19:32:04 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
ERIC@ERICHARSHBARGER.ORGihatespam
|
Viewed:
|
604 times
|
| |
|
|
Yes, there were definitely some compromises made in the LEGO DNA model.
The eight base-pairs/turn was the most obvious. Basically, I needed, in
a short timeframe, to come up with a fair representation of the 'idea of
a DNA molecule'... and I think that this model looks more like a DNA
structure than it does anything else [grin].
eric
"John J. Ladasky Jr." wrote:
>
> In lugnet.general, Eric Harshbarger writes:
> >
> > A while back a number of 'mathematically inclined' LEGO models were
> > posted and generated a lot of interest.
> >
> > Here's my contribution to such a theme:
> >
> > http://www.ericharshbarger.org/lego/dna.html
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > eric
>
> Very nice, Eric!
>
> As a biologist, I've been toying with the idea of building a DNA molecule
> myself. Here are some details you might like to know (or, maybe not?):
>
> 1) You have eight base-pairs per turn of the helix, an obvious and sensible
> choice for Lego modeling. The pitch of real DNA is sightly over ten bases per
> turn.
>
> 2) The grooves between the bases are equally spaced in your model, and the base
> pairs are represented as straight lines going straight through the central
> axis. In real DNA, there's a "major groove" and a "minor groove," and the
> bases do not directly oppose each other. They meet at an angle. This also
> complicates modeling.
>
> --
> John J. Ladasky Jr., Ph.D.
> Department of Biology
> Johns Hopkins University
> Baltimore, MD 21218
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Harshbarger / eric@ericharshbarger.org / www.ericharshbarger.org
"Oh please, if people are going to start telling the truth around
here... I'm going to bed." - Jackie-O (Parker Posey, THE HOUSE OF YES)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO DNA Sculpture
|
| (...) Very nice, Eric! As a biologist, I've been toying with the idea of building a DNA molecule myself. Here are some details you might like to know (or, maybe not?): 1) You have eight base-pairs per turn of the helix, an obvious and sensible (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.build)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
