 | | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog" —Jeremy H. Sproat
| | | | (...) *Almost* forgotten. I was *this* close, too... :-, Just kidding. I've been hearing about your LDraw-admin feats behind-the-scenes, so I figured you'd post again some time soon... Glad to see ya again. Think you'll be putting out new models (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog" —Terry Keller
| | | | | (...) post (...) new (...) The biggest LDraw-admin feat was having Steve take over. :-) (Thanks again, Steve!) Having been drawn into the whole Kidvention thing (a fun, though sunburned, time), I find myself *trying* to read lugnet more. The only (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog" —Selçuk Göre
| | | | | (...) Yes, of course you can't go thicker for airfoils with a supersonic aircraft, and of course making it thicker has no really disadvantages for a low speed aircraft (and also you should have to make it thick for these low speeds, to obtain (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog" —Terry Keller
| | | | | (...) wings. (...) The A-10 doesn't have to worry about going supersonic. :-) The wing has a substantial amount of curvature over the top surface, better for generating high lift, I think. (...) Busy with life in general. Lugnet got to be too much (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
