To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 3048
3047  |  3049
Subject: 
Re: More studs in holes...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build
Date: 
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:24:07 GMT
Reply-To: 
LEGO@SONGTWO.DEMONnomorespam.CO.UK
Viewed: 
668 times
  
"Selçuk " wrote:

Jonathan Perret <jperret@cybercable.fr> wrote in message

<snip>

The only reasonable explanation I have found so far is that
they are not using a 3-D package to compose the instructions at
all. I'm still having a hard time believing this but I can't explain
the mistakes otherwise.

Cheers,
--Jonathan


Yes, it is seemingly impossible at the beginning but I've seen a 8880
instruction error related to a 1x1 technic brick with hole, and I still
don't have any clue how a 3D CAD system can do this (especially by using a
ready to use 3D library of bricks)..:-)

SElçuk

The consistency in instruction styles from the mid to late 70's onwards
through until now makes me wonder about this. They couldn't have been
using a CAD system them (surely? far too expensive) so they'd have been
done by draughts[wo]men, and it seems reasonable that until (and unless)
they could get the same quality via a CAD system it would still be done
manually today.

I do wonder what role CAD/CAM played in the surge of pieces around
86/87, with all the new 'diagonal' pieces, tiles, small L-shaped (2x2
minus 1) bricks and grilles that started appearing then, and the
increase in printing (the first non-standard fig heads were in 89,
weren't they?) That seems more likely than a change in the instruction
scans side.

:: paul



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More studs in holes...
 
(...) The errors I see are definitely impossible with a 3D CAD system. Except an _extremely_ buggy one. On the other hand, such errors are also highly unlikely to appear in hand-drawn graphics. Glaring perspective errors would have been noticed by (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.build, lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More studs in holes...
 
Jonathan Perret <jperret@cybercable.fr> wrote in message <snip> (...) Yes, it is seemingly impossible at the beginning but I've seen a 8880 instruction error related to a 1x1 technic brick with hole, and I still don't have any clue how a 3D CAD (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.build)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR