Subject:
|
Re: How many brick separators do you need if a brick separator could split bricks?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:37:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
510 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> In lugnet.market.shopping, Allan Bedford writes:
>
> > I gave away one of my 4 for the simple reason that I thought I was already
> > overstocked. The odd time I do use one... I use only one. Am I missing
> > something? Or is there a reason for needing them in pairs? I'm asking
> > seriously, as I really don't know.
>
> As another poster relates, using them in pairs is about the easiest way to
> separate certain kinds of stacked plate combos. One on top, one on bottom.
Yep, two are very useful in certain situation.
> I rarely have a need for more than 2 at any given time, but on my current
> project, I have 4 ready to hand because one of the things I am doing is
> laying large plates onto baseplates, or onto superbricks (10x20, 12x24 etc).
> When I place a 6x16 and find I didn't put it in the right spot, 4 separators
> along the 16 edge are barely enough to lift it back up again. Sometimes the
> top studs on the plate actually get marred a bit by doing it, too.
I find that with most larger plates, a little working at one end will
get it lifted up enough that a fingernail can get under and pull the
whole plate off. If I need to work it more, I just work my way down,
prising a little bit every several studs.
I have definitely had situations where I've damaged studs while trying
to separate pieces.
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
